Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roger Stack's avatar

I’m currently reading D. W. Pasulka’s ‘The Others: UFOs, AI and the Secret Forces Guiding Human Destiny’.

Just before reading your post, I read the following as I finished Chapter 8 exploring Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s concept of the noosphere.

“Chardin believed that the noosphere would prepare the way for the emergence of a new human—what he called the Ultra-human. This was no mere enhancement of cognitive capacity or processing speed. It was the spiritual intensification of the person, oriented toward divine love.

For Chardin, the Ultra-human is a transfigured form of the human being, not the post-human self. Christ stood at the end of the evolutionary arc not as an impersonal force, but as the radiant heart of the world, summoning all creation into union without erasure.

But today, AI technologists who speak of “mapping the noosphere” often mean something else. For some, the noosphere is not a spiritual horizon but a computational one. It is not a field of love, but of data. The new human being they envision is less a transfigured self than a brain-machine interface. Perhaps both are possible now.

So, we must ask: Are we building toward Chardin’s Omega Point—or merely a neural net masquerading as one? Are we shaping technologies that help us become more fully human, or more easily replaced? Are both scenarios the case?”

CCF-CourtFisher's avatar

Amah, I agree with this subtlety of discernment, and that suggests that “EVERY” AI purporting to offer wisdom dialogue should open with a ‘disclaimer’ pointing the user to their own human experience-in-relationship with others.

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?